Lyre Leads
Compare Google Maps Lead Generation Tools
Side-by-side comparison of Lyre Leads vs D7 Lead Finder, Scrap.io, Outscraper, and the Chrome extension scrapers, plus how it stacks up against Apollo, ZoomInfo, and Clay. See exactly which tool gives you the most data, best value, and smartest automation.
Full Feature Comparison
All features compared across 8 Google Maps lead generation tools. Competitor data verified July 2026. Apollo, ZoomInfo, Clay, and Outscraper are compared separately below.
| Feature | Lyre Leads | D7 Lead Finder | Scrap.io | MapLeadScraper | 21LeadFinder | LeadStal | GMapsLeads | GMapsExtractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform | ||||||||
| Type | Web App | Web App | Web App | Extension | Web App | Extension | Extension | Extension |
| Installation required | No | No | No | Chrome | No | Chrome | Chrome/Edge | Chrome |
| Works on mobile/tablet | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No |
| Server-side scraping | Yes | Yes | Yes | Browser | Unclear | Browser | Browser | Browser |
| Live real-time data | Yes, fresh results | Pre-built database | Yes | Yes (browser) | Unclear | Yes (browser) | Yes (browser) | Yes (browser) |
| Pricing | ||||||||
| Free tier | 500 tokens/mo | Preview only | 7-day trial | 1,000/mo | 7-day trial | Yes | 10 leads | 1,000/mo |
| Starting price | $0/mo | $44.99/mo | €49/mo | $19.90/mo | $49/mo | $9.99/mo | $25/mo | ~$39/mo |
| Top tier price | $499/mo | $119.99/mo | €499/mo | $19.90/mo | $149/mo | $99/mo | $25/mo | $799/mo |
| Annual billing discount | 40% off | No | Yes | Yes | No | One-time packs | No | No |
| Data Enrichment | ||||||||
| Data fields per lead | 50+ | ~20 | 70+ | ~10 | Unclear | ~10 | Basic | 31 |
| Email extraction | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Email provider detection | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Social media profiles | 6 platforms | Yes | Yes | Basic | Basic | Basic | Basic | Basic |
| Tech stack detection | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| CMS detection | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Facebook Pixel detection | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Multi-network pixel detection (TikTok, Pinterest, Snapchat, Reddit, Quora, Yandex) | Yes | Partial | Partial | No | No | No | No | No |
| Google Analytics detection | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Google Tag Manager | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Google Remarketing | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| SSL/HTTPS check | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Mobile-friendly check | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Domain age | Yes (RDAP) | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Page load speed | Yes (ms) | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Contact form detection | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
| Schema markup detection | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| AI & Intelligence | ||||||||
| AI relevance check | Yes (unique) | No | No | No | Vague | No | No | No |
| Custom AI prompts | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Export & Integration | ||||||||
| CSV export | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes (Growth+) | Yes | Yes | No | Enterprise | No | No | Yes |
| CRM integrations | Built-in CRM | No | No | No | Pro+ only | No | No | No |
Lyre Leads vs D7 Lead Finder
D7 Lead Finder is a long-established web-based tool with a claimed database of ~65 million business records. It offers ad/pixel detection, social metrics, and a REST API, but lacks any AI relevance check and modern website enrichment.
Where Lyre Leads wins
- Free tier, 500 tokens/month vs no free plan
- Lower starting price, $39/mo vs $44.99/mo
- AI relevance checking, evidence quoted from the page, GPT-4o-mini
- Multi-network pixel detection, Pinterest, Snapchat, Reddit, Quora, Yandex (D7 detects FB + Google only)
- 1,200+ tech stack & CMS detections, across 36 categories
- Domain age & page speed, not available on D7
- Modern UI, D7's interface is dated
Where D7 Lead Finder wins
- Larger pre-built database, ~65M records for instant lookup
- Long-established, longer track record
- No token system, search their database directly
Lyre Leads vs Scrap.io
Scrap.io is the most feature-rich competitor, offering 70+ data columns, tech stack detection, ad pixel detection, and a REST API. It's the closest competitor in enrichment depth but lacks any AI relevance check and charges significantly more.
Where Lyre Leads wins
- Perpetual free tier, $0/mo vs a 7-day trial then €49/mo
- AI relevance checking, unique to Lyre Leads
- 1,200+ tech detections across 36 categories, broader than Scrap.io's tech coverage
- 70% cheaper entry, $39/mo vs €49/mo (~$53 USD)
- Mobile-friendly & schema detection, not on Scrap.io
- Page load speed measurement, not on Scrap.io
Where Scrap.io wins
- More raw data columns, 70+ Google Maps columns (price level, hours, claimed/unclaimed via Place Details API)
- Place Details enrichment, Scrap.io pays for the SerpAPI Place Details endpoint we currently skip
- Higher volume plans, up to unlimited on €499/mo
Lyre Leads vs Apollo & ZoomInfo
Apollo and ZoomInfo are firmographic contact databases built from LinkedIn profiles and filings. They are strong for direct-dial contacts at enterprise accounts, but they sell a fixed list and can't tell you what a business actually runs. Lyre Leads is a different category: live discovery from Google Maps, per-business tech-stack enrichment, and an AI check that each result really is the business you searched for.
Where Lyre Leads wins
- Live coverage from Google Maps, not a fixed database limited to companies that maintain LinkedIn profiles and filings
- Per-business tech stack, CRM and pixel data, target by what a business actually uses; Apollo and ZoomInfo don't carry this
- Custom-keyword discovery, state the business you want and pull every match instead of filtering firmographic fields
- AI relevance checks, every match read and marked as really being the business you searched for, with the sentence that proves it
- Free tier, no seat minimums or annual contracts
Where Apollo & ZoomInfo win
- Direct-dial and personal-email contact data, deep person-level records we deliberately don't maintain
- Enterprise firmographics, employee counts, funding rounds, and org charts
- Intent data and sequencing, mature sales-engagement tooling
Many teams use both: Lyre Leads for live market coverage and tech-stack targeting, Apollo or ZoomInfo for last-mile contact data on the accounts that matter most.
Lyre Leads vs Clay
Clay is an enrichment and orchestration platform: a spreadsheet-style canvas that runs a waterfall across 100+ data providers and an AI research agent (Claygent) to enrich and research records. It can pull local businesses from Google Maps as one of its sources, but its focus is enriching a list you assemble, and it is a build-it-yourself toolkit aimed at technical and ops users. Lyre Leads is a turnkey discovery-to-scoring product for a single keyword-driven workflow.
Where Lyre Leads wins
- Turnkey, not a canvas, state a keyword and get enriched, scored leads without building a table of provider calls
- An AI relevance check out of the box, with the sentence from the company's own site quoted as evidence; Clay leaves you to assemble scoring from Claygent prompts and formulas yourself
- Purpose-built for local and SMB discovery, live from Google Maps by keyword and geography
- Simpler, more predictable pricing, no dual pool of data credits and actions to meter
- Lower barrier to start, free tier with the full enrich-and-score workflow, no setup
Where Clay wins
- Enrichment breadth, a waterfall across 100+ providers far beyond our built-in detections
- Claygent AI research, an agent that runs arbitrary web research per row
- Enriches any list, works on records from any source, not just Maps-discovered ones
- Deep customization and CRM sync, two-way HubSpot and Salesforce sync plus outreach integrations
Different jobs, and many teams pair them: Lyre Leads to discover and pre-qualify the local universe by keyword, Clay to run deep multi-provider enrichment on the shortlist that scores well.
Lyre Leads vs Chrome Extension Scrapers
MapLeadScraper, LeadStal, GMapsLeads, and GMapsExtractor are all Chrome browser extensions. While they're cheap and simple, they have fundamental limitations that server-side tools like Lyre Leads don't share.
MapLeadScraper
- Chrome extension only
- Claims 100K leads/mo
- Basic email & social scraping
- No AI relevance check
- No tech stack detection
- No ad/pixel detection
- Free plan: 1,000 leads/mo
LeadStal
- Chrome extension + web
- Multi-platform (Maps, Instagram, Bing, Zillow)
- Free plan; one-time credit packs from $5
- Email validation + email/SMS outreach
- No AI relevance check
- No tech/CMS/ad detection
GMapsLeads
- Chrome/Edge extension
- Claims unlimited leads (Pro)
- Email + social fields
- No AI relevance check
- No enrichment
- No CRM
- Free plan (10 leads)
GMapsExtractor
- Chrome extension + cloud app
- 31 data fields claimed
- REST API on paid tiers
- No AI relevance check
- No website/tech enrichment
- Free plan: 1,000 records/mo
The bottom line on Chrome extensions
Browser extensions are limited to what Google Maps shows in your browser, typically ~120 results per search due to scroll limits. They can't enrich data server-side, can't score leads against your criteria, and stop working when Google updates its page structure. Lyre Leads runs server-side, enriches every lead with 50+ data points, and checks each one really is the business type you searched for, quoting the sentence from its site that proves it.
Lyre Leads vs 21LeadFinder
21LeadFinder is a web application priced from $49 to $149/month, with a $997 one-time option. It mentions "AI Enrichment" but provides little detail on what this actually includes. It offers CRM integrations on higher tiers.
Where Lyre Leads wins
- Free tier, 500 tokens/mo included
- Transparent AI checks, evidence quoted from the page, published methodology
- 40+ verified enrichment data points, each documented
- Multi-network pixel detection, Pinterest, Snapchat, Reddit, Quora, Yandex
- 1,200+ tech stack & CMS detections
- Domain age & page speed metrics
Where 21LeadFinder wins
- CRM integrations, HubSpot, Salesforce, GoHighLevel, Zapier on Pro+
- One-time lifetime option, $997 for 1M leads (no subscription)
Lyre Leads vs Outscraper
Outscraper is a pay-as-you-go data extraction service. It pulls raw Google Maps records at about $3 per 1,000 (more with email and review add-ons), and exposes everything through a developer API with no subscription. It is the cheapest way to get raw Maps data at volume. Lyre Leads is a workflow that turns that raw data into enriched, scored leads you can act on.
Where Lyre Leads wins
- An AI relevance check, every lead read against the business type you searched for; Outscraper has none
- Website enrichment, tech stack, CMS, ad pixels, and buying signals; Outscraper returns raw Maps plus contact data only
- Built-in CRM and outbound, work leads without exporting to another tool
- Country-wide automation, Smart Strategy sweeps every city for a keyword with dedup and resume
- Ready-to-work leads, not a raw CSV you have to enrich and score yourself
Where Outscraper wins
- Pure pay-as-you-go, no subscription, credits never expire, ideal for one-off pulls
- Very low raw-data cost, ~$3 per 1,000 Google Maps records
- Broad scraper catalog, reviews and many sources beyond Google Maps
- Developer-first API, included on every plan, even the free tier
Rule of thumb: Outscraper if you want a cheap raw data dump to process yourself, Lyre Leads if you want enriched, scored, workflow-ready leads without building the pipeline.
Why Choose Lyre Leads?
Only tool that checks every lead really is what you searched for
Name the business type you are after. Every lead is read against its own website and comes back marked yes, no or unclear, carrying the sentence from that page which justifies the verdict. In a 284-business study, reading the site kept 98.8% of the genuine businesses against 87.4% for filtering on Google's category.
Free tier with real value
500 tokens every month, enough to search, enrich, and score leads before committing. No credit card required, no time-limited trials.
Deepest enrichment at lowest price
50+ data points per lead starting at $0/mo. Competitors charge $45-$53+/mo for similar (or fewer) enrichment fields.
Country-wide automated search
Smart Strategy queues every city in a country and runs deduplicated background searches. Pause, resume, and pick up where you left off across multi-session campaigns. No other Google Maps tool does this.
Try Lyre Leads Free
500 tokens every month. No credit card. 50+ data points per lead. Lead scoring included.